Urban Fathers' Liberation Front

Confused dads working out the city

What value do local people bring to placemaking?

on November 15, 2012

Google ‘Andover Estate’ and you’ll find a relentless list of negative outpourings about this sprawling but dense Council estate north of the Seven Sisters Road – police, assaults, witnesses, drugs, gangs, fear, murder.  You might find that Ann Widdecombe spent a night or two on the estate in 2006 and didn’t leave it with a flattering opinion.   You could stumble on something positive, but the chinks of light are hard to come by.

At the beginning of  my career, in the mid 1990s, the most satisfying part of town planning was explaining the process of forward planning and policy writing to those who came to the office, usually because they’d found out that something was going to be built that would affect them.  When people engaged directly with the process, they understood what we were trying to do; as important, if not more important, we understood what drove them and what their concerns were.  Working with the public has remained the most satisfying element, and as ‘consultation’ became ‘engagement’, as coming to us has become going to them, and forward planning has become community led planning, it remains so.
On the first visit of a neighbourhood planning project on the estate in 2011, and with prior knowledge limited to that Google search, I struggled to find the way into Andover from the surrounding roads.  It was forbidding, impenetrable.  The estate was hard and harsh; there were no clear lines of sight; walkways criss-crossed overhead, external stairways rose up and twisted out of sight, lines of garages faced the roads, and each other, at ground level.  People seemed suddenly to loiter, collect, watch, threaten.  Trees and open spaces were worn, play areas cried out for attention and repair.  I was daunted.

I was meeting Richard Schunemann, long term resident and campaigner on the estate and, as it transpires, all round inspiration.  Fighting, yet accepting of, the negative perception of the estate, Richard and his colleagues running the community hub at the heart of the estate had achieved incremental and iterative improvement over ten years, including a beautiful community space right in the middle of the estate, complete with bespoke, artistic children’s play space.  Still unwilling to give control to the Council, he put some trust in my organisation to deliver a plan to use left over space on the fringes of the estate more productively.

Richard himself was unsure of the feelings of the residents towards the possibility of new development on the estate, perhaps new people coming in.  Gathering a diverse group of residents on the final day of the project, even he was surprised at the loyalty residents had towards the estate, how people liked the location and the sense of community that existed, but also at the severe problems of accommodation, maintenance, access and fear which was very real.  As a resident, he was opened unto the stories the estate offered, to the experience of living there beyond the perception.

The bottom line is that the local people will always have a unique perspective on place.  They live there, they use the spaces and buildings, and they’re there each day, day and night.  It’s a perspective that planners, politicians, architects, funders and others cannot have.  Naturally, residents usually don’t have the perspective of those trained to understand policy, financial and legislative context, but it is the reason why each should let the other in and allow trust to build.  Any other way is ultimately flawed.

This post was written for The Glass House Community Led Design blog as part of their Debate Series sponsored by The Academy of Urbanism, and it can be viewed here.


One response to “What value do local people bring to placemaking?

  1. Patrick says:

    Lived on the estate from ’77-’97, much of it was still being finished off and we used to play in the new (empty) buildings and the last few demolished ruins. Great memories of living there and was sad to leave. The place was going downhill fast and needed the much needed facelift.

    Being my age, I found it characterless when passing through again in 2010, but I suppose the modifications were inevitable. I mean, playing hide and seek there now can’t be as much fun as it was back in the day, all those alleys and shortcuts….and garages! This huge number was of the idea that car ownership would escalate massively at the time of planning, which didn’t happen, leaving dark passages with many empty garages.

    Would love to see some old pictures of the streets before they were cleared to build the place.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: